The cancer of the British body politic

The Daily Mail wants to know “who will speak for England”. Its front page editorial was a ranting demand that the Brexit campaign gets its act together and ensures that the United Kingdom is taken out of the European Union and into a mid-Atlantic neo-conservative dystopia even more nightmarish than the one we’re currently trapped in. The Mail’s wet dream is to turn Britain into a low wage economy with no worker’s rights and where everything has been privatised. They want to turn us into the shit kicking bits of the USA only with worse weather and bad food.

The words who will speak for England are based on those uttered by anti-appeasement Tory MP Leo Amery in 1939 when Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain implied to the House of Commons that he wouldn’t support going to war with Germany even though the Nazi regime had just invaded Poland. In doing so Berlin had torn up the Munich Agreement which Chamberlain signed in his infamous meeting with Hitler the previous year and which he claimed had secured peace in our time. The price of peace was the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia. Then as now, the rights of small countries get ignored by larger ones. As the Labour deputy leader Arthur Greenwood rose to speak in the debate in the Commons, he said he was speaking for Labour. Amery called out “Speak for England!” Scotland wasn’t significant to Tories then, so some things never change.

By one of those weird twists of historical coincidence, Leo Amery’s son Julian played a leading role in the Tory campaign to deny Scotland devolution when Harold Wilson proposed a weak form of self-government in the 1970s. His father didn’t acknowledge the existence of Scotland, and his son worked his wee Argyle socks off to ensure that Scotland wouldn’t have any voice of its own. Now his father’s words are being used to deny that Scotland exists at all. Julian would be so proud. Incidentally, Leo’s other son, John, was hanged just after the war for collaborating with the Nazis.

The Mail did, in a small line buried deep within the text, insist that it wasn’t comparing Angela Merkel to Hitler, although if it wasn’t then it would never have thought of using the headline in the first place. Mind you, the Daily Mail isn’t exactly noted for its thinking. It’s noted for its knee jerk right wing extremism, its hatred, its intolerance, and its bawbaggery. It’s pretty hypocritical of the Mail to quote leading figures in the struggle against the Nazis and enlist them into its Eurohatred campaign, because in the 1930s the Daily Mail’s owner Lord Rothermere was a notorious supporter of the Nazis. But then self-awareness isn’t one of the Tory right’s strong suits. Not so deep down in the psyche of the English right, we’re still fighting WW2.

If the Daily Mail did any thinking it might have thought that as soon as it published that pretentious and portentious headline that it would have seven shades of shazbot ripped out of it on Twitter, because that is exactly what happened. Social media users were happy to give the Mail their suggestions about who should speak for England, the Chuckle Brothers, Mr Blobby, Lauren “Am I bovvered”, Boris Johnson dangling from a zip wire, Mr Bean, that woman who put a cat in a bin, or Bungle from Rainbow. All of these suggestions – with the possible exception of Boris – were more plausible than anyone in the Brexit campaign.

Elsewhere buried deep within the text was a wee line saying that by “England” the Mail of course meant the United Kingdom. There we were during the independence referendum being told that we were a loved and valued part of this great family of nations, the most perfect union of countries in the history of the multiverse. Scotland gets to punch above its weight because of the UK.

While most Yes voters in Scotland were already aware that to all intents and purposes Scotland had been subsumed within Greater England, Scotland’s No voters were in blissful denial and the British establishment was quite happy to keep them that way. Paying lip service to the Union instead of England allows the No voters of Scotland can keep focussing on teacakes, the fragrancy of fantasy authors, and the myriad ways in which the SNP is really, really bad. Then they can ignore where the power really lies in this country, and it’s not with Scotland.

Now it’s plastered all over the front page of the Mail that Scotland is an English region. We really are just Scotlandshire, and you thought that was only a joke. The Mail is the mirror of the views of the nastier parts of Middle England. The parts that vote UKIP and Tory, the parts that are convinced that England is uniquely special amongst the nations of the world. The parts that Tony Blair and Gordie Broon’s Labour pandered to. The parts that think England encompasses this entire island. You know, the kind of territorial aggrandisement of the sort favoured by German governments in the first half of the 20th century. Not that I am at all implying that the Tory right in the UK is in any way shape or form prone to outbreaks of Nazism. Oh no. I’m not drawing that comparison in exactly the same way that the Mail isn’t drawing comparisons between Merkel and Hitler. So that’s OK then.

The Scottish edition of the hate-rag had a different headline. Even the Mail’s more swivel eyed journos realised that subsuming Scotland within England wasn’t going to play well in Scotland, so we got one of the Mail’s cancer stories instead. Admittedly everything published by the Mail is cancer, but this time Scotland was treated to a story saying that more of us are surviving cancer than ever before, probably because we have the good sense not to read the carcinogenic Daily Mail.

The English Tory right is the real pus filled well of grievance. England always gets the governments it votes for, Scotland and Wales don’t. If England votes to leave the EU then the entire UK will be wrenched out, irrespective of what voters in Scotland or Wales want. Who will speak for England? England has its Tory government. But when the question is who will speak for Scotland? The Mail has no answer, neither it nor England’s Tory government cares.

Scotland will consider that question in May, and the answer will not be the Europhobic Tory right. The Daily Mail is the cancer of the British body politic. In its pro-indy parties, Scotland has a cure.


BUTRT cover front(1)BARKING UP THE RIGHT TREE Barking Up the Right Tree has now been published and is an anthology of my articles for The National newspaper. You can submit an advance order for the book on the Vagabond Voices website at http://vagabondvoices.co.uk/?page_id=1993

Price is just £7.95 for 156 pages of doggy goodness. Order today!

A limited number of signed copies of the two volumes of the Collected Yaps is also still available. See below for order details.


Donate to the Dug This blog relies on your support and donations to keep going – I need to make a living, and have bills to pay. Clicking the donate button will allow you to make a payment directly to my Paypal account. You do not need a Paypal account yourself to make a donation. You can donate as little, or as much, as you want. Many thanks.

Donate Button

Order the Collected Yaps of the Wee Ginger Dug Vols 1 & 2 for only £21.90 for both volumes. A limited number of signed copies is still available, so get your order in now! P&P will be extra, approximately £3 per single volume or £4 for both sent together. If you only want to order one volume, please specify which. Single volumes are available for £10.95 per copy.

To order please send an email with WEE GINGER BOOK ORDER in the subject field to weegingerbook@yahoo.com giving your name, postal address, and email address and which volumes (1, 2 or both) you wish to order. I will contact you with details of how to make payment. Payment can be made by Paypal, or by cheque or bank transfer.

32 comments on “The cancer of the British body politic

  1. Alan Johnston says:

    Alec Douglas Home was Chamberlain’s bag carrier at Munich.It was said of him that he started his career betraying Czechoslovakia and ended it betraying Scotland.

  2. […] The cancer of the British body politic […]

  3. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Brilliant as usual, but especially this one liner

    “The English Tory right is the real pus filled well of grievance.”

    • Aucheorn says:

      My favourite line as well.
      and of course “They want to turn us into the shit kicking bits of the USA ” We could vote for Trump then.

  4. andygm1 says:

    Your best yet. Should be required reading.

  5. Here be a plea for a small grammatical device that still works remarkably well (maybe its all this smartphone tweeting et cetera that is doing the damage to this useful convention?) Anyway, shurely the above should read, ‘pus-filled’ and ‘shit-kicking’? The hyphen is in real danger of becoming extinct – a neighbour of the dodo and holy willie and his ilk.

  6. Neilyn says:

    The English Establishment is getting more and more loopy by the day. Won’t be long before David Starkey ‘proves’ that God is an Anglo-Saxon.

    Cyfarchion o Gymru.

    • Whitburnsfinest says:

      Not only that, but that the Almighty votes Tory, thinks the EU is a mess and – so I’m told – He also had (has??) a crush on Margaret Thatcher. All true!

  7. DaveM says:

    Oh Paul. ‘Pus filled well’ is a brilliant metaphor, but it really did make me feel quite ill when I read it. A brilliant piece.

  8. […] Source: The cancer of the British body politic […]

  9. macart763M says:

    Oh, that’s a keeper! Superb Paul.

    Aye they’re scary folks, from the publisher on down to the readership. The whole institution reeks of entitlement, arrogance, condescension, a complete empathy bypass and an unhealthy dose of willful ignorance. Spookily, not unlike the politicians they vote for to enforce their world view in Commons.

    I always have the urge to bathe upon even accidentally viewing an archived version of a Mail article.

  10. Tinto Chiel says:

    Paul, I liked this so much I decided to come out of posting retirement for a few seconds. In recent months I have really enjoyed your sage and sophisticated comments on both Gaelic and Scots both here and in The National, but we should never forget the DM’s notorious headline from 1934: “Hurrah for the Blackshirts.”

    It is a title beyond parody and beyond hope.

    Lest we forget.

    (And paulgmccormack59: maybe we should start the Hyphen Appreciation Society.)

  11. Dan Huil says:

    Remember also that the Mail was responsible for the notorious “Zinoviev Letter”. Lying britnat scum then, lying britnat scum now.

  12. lanark says:

    I have followed your excellent blog for a good while now, but this post really stands out. One of the saddest things about remaining in the Union for me is that the Daily Mail still plays a part in opinion forming in the country I live and raise my children in.

    The English Tory Right regard this whole island as theirs, from Lands’ End to John O’ Groats. They cannot countenance sharing it with a peaceful Northern neighbour.

  13. Steve Asaneilean says:

    Lies, damped lies and the Daily Mail.

    It is so widely known that the Daily Mail is incapable of telling the truth that I now feel anyone who buys/reads it is simply being complici.

  14. Steve Asaneilean says:

    Dammed lies – I must stop using my not so smart phone for posting!

  15. Steve Asaneilean says:

    By the way – good piece on the state of the media by Robin MacAlpine:

    https://www.commonspace.scot/articles/3402/robin-mcalpine-the-scottish-media-really

  16. Janet says:

    Absolutely spot-on!

  17. Hetty says:

    Excellent thanks. Of course the differences in the daily rags across the border, is completely orchestrated. My cousin, in NE England were horrified when Incalled Ukok, Ukok. They have often said they heard virtually nothing about the Indy ref on tv or radio or in the rags down their way. They are if course easily conned and continue to be, by the britnat establishment, to them Scotland is the spoilt brat of the family.

    I watched this talk earlier, it’s worth a watch, some interesting ideas on UKok and austerity etc.
    http://www.thecanary.co/2016/02/03/editor-chief-canary-smashes-austerity-bits-video/

  18. Hetty says:

    sorry the typos, too late to be up!

  19. Cloggins says:

    I read that DM article and could not make head or tails of it: it was ranting all over the place, with no clear direcion, just guided by the underbelly. Thank you for kicking it back into its cage where at least we can see the outline of this monstrum.

  20. Iain says:

    According to EU law, does the population of England have the right to strip the people of Scotland (and Wales and Northern Ireland) of their EU citizenship in the event of England voted to leave? I don’t know, but it could be an interesting international court case.

    • macart763M says:

      Last I heard, the FM was looking for a WM ruling in that a referendum bill included a double lock agreement. Far as I know that’s about as far as it went with WM. Of course the case made by the Scottish Government to the Scottish electorate from this point on Brexit = Indyref2 is pretty strong. It would be fair to say that they had given WM every chance to include such a ruling in their referendum bill and had ignored the plea of the Scottish government. Not sure if there has been any movement on that since last year TBH.

      “If the UK is a family of nations, then nobody should dictate to the others,” she said. “My message is: you don’t want to create the conditions for another independence referendum. I am putting forward the mechanism to stop that happening.” (speaking at the EPC last year)

  21. What happens if rUK vote is so close that a Scotland majority vote to ‘remain’ keeps us all in by a whisker? Perhaps then the English/rUK outrage would prove a most efficient mechanism to usher in indyref2 and our final departure from the union…?

    • macart763M says:

      As I understand it the mechanism I mentioned above is only intended to prevent the Nations being pulled out against their national will. If Westminster chooses not to include the clause, the only folk responsible for the scenario you suggest, would be Westminster itself. It would however bring the UK constitutional issue very much to the fore again, but the pressure and spotlight this time would firmly be on the Westminster government.

      However, the latest poll suggests a tough job of work for the pro EU camp in the next few months, so more the likelihood of Scotland being pulled out against what is currently the popular vote in Scotland.

      http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-referendum-brexit-campaign-takes-nine-point-lead-just-months-from-expected-poll-a6854751.html

      Either scenario could arguably present an indyref opportunity.

  22. Joke? What joke? Don’t get it.

Comments are closed.