Business as usual

marginalised

Sorry for the intermittent blog posts over the past week, but pretty much on the spur of the moment I went to Connecticut to be with my husband for Valentine’s Day. I didn’t mention it on the blog because I wanted to surprise him.

On the day I left I had published a piece in The National about the issues around the BBC’s lack of proper representation of independence supporters in their debate programmes. Although I do most of the public speaking for The National’s Roadshow events, I’ve only ever been invited once onto a BBC current affairs programme, and that was in the aftermath of photiegate, when the Sunday Herald published the photo of the huge rally in Glasgow which managed to make a tiny wee group of right wing British nationalist extremists look the same size as an independence rally of 60,000 people. I felt that the only reason the BBC had asked me on was because they were looking for an independence campaigner to slag off a pro-independence newspaper. I was conveniently busy that day.

I don’t really expect to be invited onto the BBC, because I used to be involved with Newsnet Scotland, and am one of those people that Ken McQuarrie, the former director of BBC Scotland, once described as “those bastards from Newsnet”. However in the piece for The National last Tuesday I had mentioned that despite my extensive contacts within the independence movement, I didn’t know anyone who had been approached by the BBC to appear on any of the new politics or current affairs programmes planned for the new McGhetto channel scheduled to launch next week. This doesn’t bode well for the BBC’s repeated promises to listen to its Scottish viewers.

I landed in Hartford Connecticut on Tuesday afternoon last week, and the moment I logged into the airport’s WiFi, I received an email from Mentorn, the production company responsible for Question Time and BBC Scotland’s The Big Debate, asking me if I was available to appear on the panel for an edition of The Big Debate to be filmed that Sunday. Given the article I had published in The National that morning, I laughed out loud when I got the email. I wasn’t due to return to Scotland until Wednesday morning this week, so had to decline. In their email, Mentorn had offered to pay my travel expenses, but obviously they didn’t mean paying for a transatlantic flight. They only do that if you’re a far right Ukip candidate and a member of a sectarian flute band. I have told them that I’ll be available for future programmes, although I still have deep reservations about their audience selection procedures.

I’m back home now, and normal ranting service has been resumed. When I flew back into Dublin yesterday morning, I presented my British passport to the Irish immigration officer and said “It’s the passport of shame.” He laughed and replied, “Well not for a couple of weeks yet.” I remarked that I hoped that pretty soon I’d be coming into Dublin with a European Scottish passport, the immigration officer gave me a big smile and said “That would be the best thing. Hope you go for it.” When even immigration officers are telling you that Scottish independence is the best option, you know it makes sense.

It’s obvious now that Theresa May’s strategy is to run down the clock so that at the very last minute the House of Commons is presented with a choice between her hard Brexit mess of a deal or no deal at all. This is respecting the will of the people, apparently. But not the Scottish people, because we don’t register in Theresa’s calculations, and not the will of the slightly less than half of the UK which voted to remain. Which if nothing else means that Scotland has company as it’s being marginalised and ignored. This is now the only constitutional argument that opponents of independence have got left, “Parts of England are being ignored too, Scotland.” Because that makes it all OK then. Not.

It’s worth stressing that Theresa May’s deal is a hard Brexit. The Brexiters might not have succeeded in coming up with a realistic or plausible plan, but they have successfully moved the goalposts in the media over the course of the past two years. What was once called a hard Brexit, that is leaving the customs union and single market, is now called a soft Brexit. What was once called a soft Brexit, remaining in the customs union and single market, is now called Brexit in name only and is regarded as no Brexit at all. A hard Brexit is now defined as a calamitous falling out of the EU with no deal. The choice that Theresa May is trying to force on Parliament is a choice between a hard Brexit, or the chaos of no deal.

Meanwhile, the Fluffy One, Scotland’s very own stuffed toy cabinet minister, is making a speech in which he claims that Brexit strengthens devolution. Because Scotland being sidelined, marginalised, ignored, and told to shut up, is really an exercise in the respect agenda that David Cameron promised us way back when he wanted our votes. It’s just a pity that David Mundell doesn’t stand up and publicly lecture his cabinet colleagues in the same way that he lectures the people of Scotland. On most people his speechs make as much of an impression as a small piece of wet toilet paper being fired at a rhinocerous. His real target audience is the SiU trolls who infest the comments sections of Scottish newspapers. But then David’s job isn’t to represent Scotland in the British government, it’s to represent the British government in Scotland. His job title is Scotland Secretary, but 100 years ago there was another job title for those doing what David does. It was Governor General of the Colonies.

David Mundell’s claim is delusional, but then he represents a party which says that Theresa May’s Brexit deal “works for Britain”, so delusion and self-deception is pretty much the base state here. Brexit undermines the foundations of the devolution settlement, because the Conservatives have decided to use it to unilaterally take control of a slew of devolved powers. They further undermined the devolution settlement by passing legislation using MPs from outwith Scotland in order to retrospectively remove powers from Holyrood so that the Scottish Government’s EU Continuity Bill couldn’t be passed into law.

The big political news is of course the defection of eight Labour MPs and three Conservatives to form a new “centrist” grouping. It’s a symptom of just how screwed British politics has become that we’re being invited to pin our hopes on a Lib Dem tribute band. There are rumours that other MPs are set to follow. The goal of this new grouping is to attain 36 members, and then they can overtake the SNP as the third party and will take the SNP’s slot at PMQs. So Scotland will get even less of a say than it currently does, an already marginalised country being silenced by entitled people complaining that their voices aren’t heard. That tells you all you need to know about the priorities of Westminster.  That’s their business as usual.


You can help to support this blog with a Paypal donation. Please log into Paypal.com and send a payment to the email address weegingerbook@yahoo.com. Or alternatively click the donate button. If you don’t have a Paypal account, just select “donate with card” after clicking the button.

Donate Button

If you have trouble using the button, or you prefer not to use Paypal, you can donate or purchase a t-shirt or map by making a payment directly into my bank account, or by sending a cheque or postal order. If you’d like to donate by one of these methods, please email me at weegingerbook@yahoo.com and I will send the necessary information.

Please also use this email address if you would like the dug and me to come along to your local group for a talk.

GINGER2cropped

Gaelic maps of Scotland are available for £15 each, plus £7 P&P within the UK for up to three maps. T-shirts are £12 each, and are available in small, medium, large, XL and XXL sizes. P&P is £5 for up to three t-shirts. My books, the Collected Yaps Vols 1 to 4 are available for £11 each. P&P is £4 for up to two books. Payment can be made via Paypal.




15 comments on “Business as usual

  1. Nigel Mace says:

    The IG goal of 36 is meaningless as ‘they’ are not a party, don’t claim to be one and therefore cannot ‘take’ any position as nth party in the Commons. This is just one more delusion/illusion in the ‘U’K House of Mirrors that currently passes for serious politics in this disintegrating country. One hopes that the coming South Brexitania will enjoy watching their own distorted images – they’ve been hooked on them for decades anyway!

  2. Anne McGaughey says:

    The Independent Group can’t take the place of the SNP in Westminster my MP has told me it goes on the GE result and as these individuals haven’t won as a Party they can’t replace the SNP so I’ve been told

  3. Craig Macinnes says:

    Thanks for a great The National Road Show in Falkirk yesterday evening. Always look forward to your writing and it was a bonus to catch you live. You’re a natural.

  4. Andy Anderson says:

    I am sick of there shenanigans Paul. Nothing changes. EU said today that they think a no deal is possible.

    Anyway to more important topics. Did your short trip over the pond go OK? I hope Petrt was surprised and also his job hunt here is moving forward.

  5. JoMac says:

    I suggest that the ‘new’ Party be named The Harry Potter Party because a certain lady was down by a week or two ago drumming up interest in just this. A ‘new’ Centrist party. She imagines that they will wave their collective magic wands and POOF! that BADEssEmmPee and its dastardly adherents will vanish in a puff of smoke. (‘They like to tax rich people you know. The Queen and I don’t like it.’) It will be the same old, same old, English-based claptrap and it wouldn’t surprise me if the LibDems join in, so we’ll have one of them in this constituency who won on a ‘No more independence referendums’ ticket at the last GE. None of these people gives a damn about Scotland. We know it, they know it.

    Sadly, half of Scotland is still asleep and unaware of what’s going on and the crew of BritNats at Holyrood who are quite simply ‘unaware’ are drowning. You can tell by the way they gurgle. They’re desperately hoping that the WM lifeboat will come to their rescue again. In fact, it’s so full of holes it’s lying upside down in the Thames. David M was last seen trying to patch it up with Scotch Tape.

  6. alanm says:

    My personal view is that everybody involved in the independence movement should refuse to appear on the BBC’s new propaganda channel. And that includes the dug.

    By agreeing to participate you offer yourself up as an aunt sally and lend credibility to a broadcaster which simply doesn’t deserve it. Steer well clear is my advice.

    • alanm,
      My views are well known on providing ‘patsies’ for BBC and ITV ( it’s certainly NOT ‘Scottish’) programmes.
      Send a haggis to sit in the Pro Independence chair.
      I will not be tuning in to their White Heather Club.

  7. Alan Thomson says:

    The Cult could make sure there is a deal by voting for one but all they wasn’t is to split the U.K. nothing else matters.
    Anything to hear less from the simple crafter.

  8. I see that wee shite Mundell is threatening to resign, again.

  9. astytaylor says:

    I’ve been travelling the last few months in Asia. A lot of checking into guesthouses and producing a passport. Nationality? Scottish.
    Fellow Europeans just shake their head and make a wry face, or laugh out loud, at the mention of UK. The passport of shame, indeed.
    Back to Glasgow, via Dublin, soon. Our Celtic cousins. Looking forrward to some banter with the Immigration Officer. “And the craic was good”.
    Maybe we just need to take the piss out of the BBC wallahs more often. And as for the Fluffy One…

  10. Macart says:

    Marginalise and eject the SNP from those chambers and you delegitimise the very idea of partnership.

    The whole point of the Scottish benches and Scottish questions was that representatives of the Scottish nation/population were supposedly granted a platform relevant to their status as the significant other partner which formed the United Kingdom.

    In reality? A sop. A cosmetic. A running joke. A lip service to partnership. A place where you had a wee sit down and played scrabble whilst you waited for the big joab. So long as you played along with the binary choice game ‘course. So long as the benches were stuffed with the right sort. So long as you owed your allegiance to a party of the big two, or the concept of a single parliament and unitary state, then peachy. No one needed to worry about the fine print on international treaties.

    Two sets of laws to be forever independent and two signatories.

    So what happens when you place a majority in those benches who do recognise the fact that a treaty exists and that owe Scotland’s population their efforts? What happens when those folk start pointing out awkward inconsistencies in political practice, treatment of their population’s interests in said partnership, and adherence to the spirit of that treaty?

    Do you: a. Sit down like adults and address those inconsistencies amicably? Make some attempt at that whole unity and partnership thing… or b. Stick your fingers in your ears, act like ignorant and arrogant arses and start braying like a donkey across the chamber?

    Apparently if you’re Conservative, Labour or one of Santa’s little helpers (Libdems), you attempt to marginalise and eject those awkward types. You attempt to deny the people they represent any platform at all. Doesn’t seem a very friendly thing to do.

    Who knew?

  11. Richard Piech says:

    Just wanted to applaud your pointing out the moved goalposts of what a soft and a hard exit means.

  12. Callum MacLeod says:

    I should think that until they form a party, as such, and gain their seats the hard way, they have no such entitlement; they are just a bunch of people sitting in the wrong place at the moment.

    But I would be in favour of the trend were we to have minority, middle-of-the road and extreme-choices in a PR electoral system – one on each side of the border, that would be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s