Shining a light in the darkness

The Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War – which you, me, yer granny and her dug all know was illegal and conducted on a false premise – won’t be published this year after all. This is because Chilcot is still working on the investigation into the War of the Roses and can’t complete the process because Richard III had a right to reply to criticisms of his kingdom for a horse policy but the horse didn’t.

Ostensibly, the reason for the delay in publication of the inquiry’s findings into the Iraq War is that those who are criticised in the report must have a right to reply to the findings before publication. The report into the Iraq War hasn’t heard any new evidence since 2009, and for the past six years, Blair and the other members of his government have played keepie uppie with letters requesting that they submit their rebuttals.

Naturally, if you’re going to be called out for a war criminal in a public report and you can delay its publication by taking your time to respond to it, then that’s exactly what you’re going to do. Funnily enough Tony and Jack have no great incentive to hurry up with their replies, and Chilcot doesn’t seem disposed to give them any deadlines. You know, like the deadline Blair gave to the Iraqi government before bombing the country into oblivion and destroying it without pausing to think what might replace it.

It was the destruction of a functioning Iraqi government without a detailed policy of reconstruction that caused the fall of Iraq into a sectarian hell-hole and set off the chain of events leading to the monsters of ISIS with their institutionalised slavery. Blair – along with US president Bush – bears the primary responsibility for the devastated lives, the rapes, the broken bones, the deaths of hundreds of thousands. And yet there he is, lecturing us in the pages of the Guardian about why it’s immoral to vote for Jeremy Corbyn, who is apparently that rare thing – a Labour politician with a conscience.

The Chilcot inquiry is of course being delayed because we all know that the only fair and reasonable outcome of the inquiry process will be to call out Tony Blair and Jack Straw for the war-mongering basterts that they are. A proper inquiry would show that the UK went to war on the basis of Tony Blair getting so far up the arse of President Bush’s administration that he poured out the mouth of a far right president in a stream of verbal diarrhoea that hasn’t ceased since. But we must not be unkind, Tony Blair has one immense achievement under his belt, along with all the payments he’s received from dodgy dictators. Blair proved it really was possible for the left leaning public to loathe a politician even more than they loathed Margaret Thatcher.

The only fair and reasonable outcome of the Chilcot Inquiry would be a call to put Blair and Straw on trial for war crimes and lying to parliament. The only fair and reasonable outcome of the inquiry in sex abuse committed by powerful men in the heart of the establishment would be for the perpetrators to be put on trial.

But none of that is going to happen. The inquiry into sex abuse will name the dead not the living, in order to assure us that the threat is dead too and to pretend that sex abuse couldn’t possibly happen any more. The report will be delayed and delayed until the victims are in their old age and the perpetrators are safely dead. It will not report back until historic child abuse really is history, a report to wallpaper over the abuse that still goes on. The inquiry into the Iraq War won’t name the dead because the dead number in their hundreds of thousands. It will seek to excuse the actions of politicians who are still living. The way the inquiry is bending over backwards to allow Blair and Straw to make their representations shows us where its priorities really lie. But in the interests of justice it is only right and proper that Blair and Straw get their say. And they should get their say in a court of law.

Tony Blair was born in Scotland, and that means that when Scotland becomes independent then he will become a Scottish citizen. Some in the independence movement may be unhappy with the Scottishness of Blair and seek to deny it. I don’t. I’m glad he’s Scottish, because that means that when we gain our independence we will be able to put him on trial for war crimes, and no amount of diplomatic protection will save him from the justice of a Scottish court – because he will be a Scottish citizen. Of course this means that Blair is unlikely ever to set foot in an independent Scotland, and that all by itself would be a good result. He’ll be left cowering in countries which won’t extradite him to Scotland to stand trial.

But more importantly, with independence we have a real chance to ensure that our governments are transparent and accountable. In an independent Scotland we can have clear rules, a written constitution and means to keep the powerful in check. We have no chance of that in the British state. How many more wars, how many more broken and damaged kids, will it take for supporters of the Union to realise that the British state is founded on lies, on abuse, and on war and destruction.

It should be clear enough by now. The purpose of a British government inquiry is not to get to the truth, it’s to kick the truth far enough away in distance and time that the establishment is not harmed by it. Official inquiries exist to put blame behind a safe wall of distance, when the public has been distracted by a few seasons of Great British Strictly Come Bake Off. The bombs that fell on Iraq were real enough, the explosion of child abuse committed by powerful and well connected men was real, but official inquiries exist only to defuse the truth. They’re not about ensuring the transparency of government, they exist to make government opaque.

Only with independence can we shine a light in the darkness.

Donate to the Dug This blog relies on your support and donations to keep going – I need to make a living, and have bills to pay. Clicking the donate button will allow you to make a payment directly to my Paypal account. You do not need a Paypal account yourself to make a donation. You can donate as little, or as much, as you want. Many thanks.

Donate Button

25 comments on “Shining a light in the darkness

  1. says:

    Reblogged this on Bampots Utd.

  2. Dave Hansell says:

    The thought of Blair, Straw, Campbell et al holed up in the sanctuary of a US embassy does have a certain appeal.

  3. Jan Cowan says:

    Paul, you always get straight to the nub. Does my heart good to read your work. Many thanks.

  4. daibhidhdeux says:

    As DH says in reply to your eloquence, Dug, a delicious prospect vis a vis Blair and his warmongering henchmen holed up in some American Embassy for fear of extradition to Scotland to face trial and receive potential multiple life sentences.

    To quote Ms Wendy Alexander at her most gallous and pre-stabbing in the back by her brother since electorally filleted by Ms Mhairi Black, “Bring it on!”.

  5. Scott says:

    Next IndyRef we should say vote for independence and we’ll put Tony Blair in the dock.. Surely this will swing some of the No’s.

  6. Malky says:

    Get a joab!

  7. Malky says:

    I did agree with all you said though. 🙂

  8. macart763 says:

    That needed saying Paul.

    Couldn’t agree more.

  9. hektorsmum says:

    Well said Paul and I just would love to see his smirk rubbed off his face.

  10. […] Shining a light in the darkness. […]

  11. Maureen says:

    Well said Paul, Love to see them all in the dock.

  12. jimnarlene says:

    Surely, Scotland would have a diplomatic relationship, with the USA. Including an extradition treaty, doesn’t look too good for Tony etal.
    Not sure the Americans would do it though, Bush being involved right up to his hair follicles.

    • macart763 says:

      Doubt the American govt. would part with him in such a circumstance. I reckon Paul has hit the nail on the head. Still, his legacy is carnage, suffering and disgrace, a fractured and critically damaged Labour movement, the beggaring of a state and presiding over one of the most scandalised and corporately compromised administrations in UK political record. History won’t remember him fondly. Cold comfort I know, but the most likely outcome.

  13. That an enquiry can stop taking evidence in 2009 and still not be ready for publication in 2015 says all you need to know about the British Establishment and their total disregard for truth, honesty, justice and democracy.

    Is Blair worse than Thatcher? Well having lived through them both and having initially thought nothing could be worse than Thatcher I think the answer is now undoubtedly yes.

  14. gavin says:

    Says it all about the UK.
    You can rape children.
    You can rape an entire country.
    You can set a region of the world on a path to sectarian oblivian.
    You canloot the State, sell off public assets at a fraction of their true value, fill your pockets.
    But if you are part of the British Establishment, you can do this and more, and your “chums” will ensure nothing comes of it. Indeed will appear in the media to uphold your “reputation” and protest at any perceived slights on that reputation.
    You can be high in government, or an aide to the PM, a senior civil servant or diplomat—–and the Secret Service will see it as their DUTY to keep your nasty indiscretions from the public.
    THIS is the country we live in. The country we should leave as soon as we can.

    • Justin Fayre says:

      What a legacy we leave behind.

      Principles. … Hah
      Integrity,… What’s that?
      Honesty. …Dinnae be stupid

      Propaganda… Yeah like the sound of that Tell me more

      Welcome to The Union

  15. Morag Frame says:

    just great! WGD

  16. AndyC says:

    Brilliant! Well said Paul.

  17. Brenda Carson says:

    Hi son I know you don’t read many political articles, but this is an interesting one. I read this guy’s blog. X Mum


  18. Capella says:

    Justice delayed is justice denied.

  19. Lollysmum says:

    Good one Paul & needs saying over & over again. We also have to remember that no government of any colour has ever lost an Inquiry into it’s actions. They only exist to placate the plebs, prevaricate & obfuscate for so long that we give up on asking for answers eventually.

    However, we should never give up on calling them to account & as publicly as possible too

  20. arthur thomson says:

    Thank you for that Paul.

    My view is that we have 56 MP’s and it is a key responsibility of theirs to find ways of bringing the criminals to justice. We cannot accept that it will never happen. There has to be a serious calling out of the government and its tame opposition. Harsh words need to be said – even if those words result in MP’s being ejected from the house of horrors. The British establishment has to be charged with corruption.

    This leads me to wonder what Mr Corbyn’s stance is on all this. Can he stomach the prospect of the Labour party that he loves being exposed? Or would he see it as his duty to put party before people? Has anyone heard him screaming for justice? Maybe that is just around the corner – I await in expectation …….. Come to think about it, I haven’t noticed these issues being high on the agenda of a reinvigorated left. But I suppose in the eyes of some they are a nothing compared to nationalising the railways. Depends on your priorities. I know what mine are.

    Only by taking on the corruption can we clear the way for good government, whoever is in power.

  21. jim mulder sayers says:

    the labour party are war crimminals blair should be charged in the huuge our young mem and women died for nothing what use did the un do nothing it let America and England do what they want

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s