Waving from the quayside

Polly Toynbee, doyen of the Islington Labouristas and one time cheerleader for Tony Blair and Gordie Broon, has ventured north of the M25 and come to visit Scotland – and it’s not even the Embra Festival. There’s true dedication to the cause of writing apologias for you, or is that apologii. Anyway, in the opinion of Polly, Scotland’s about to drift off from the Union, sailing off into a state of independence almost by accident. She takes two conclusions from this, firstly that Scotland drifting off into independence is a very bad thing, and therefore following on from this as a natural logical consequence, it must all be the fault of the Tories. And there was you and me thinking that it was all Alicsammin’s fault, because everything else usually is.

Polly complains that David Cameron has never governed for a united kingdom, but instead has implemented policies which benefit his core voters in the leafier parts of the south. And this is perfectly true, although it’s an observation which is unlikely to make anyone slap their foreheads and go “Oh. My. God. I never realised.” Being selfish evil basterts is pretty much the definition of Tory, so it’s not like this is news. Just look at Iain Duncan Smith, if you can bear it, which few can. But being selfish evil basterts is written into the DNA of Torydom, and it is a fact that the word Tory comes from the Gaelic word tòraigh, which can be loosely translated as ‘selfish evil bastert’. It’s a less well known fact that the word toerag is from the Gaelic diminutive of tòraigh, and when you call someone a toerag you are in fact calling them a dwarfish Osborne, and that could scar a small child for life. And for once I’m not actually making this up. At least not much.

Of course, Polly’s definition of “very bad thing” is absolutely anything which doesn’t benefit the Westminster Labour party. Polly wants Scotland to vote for a party that abandoned it a generation ago to keep out a party that abandoned it two generations ago.

However in her rush to blame the Tories for everything, which to be fair isn’t unreasonable, Polly ignores the fact that Labour has never governed for a united kingdom either, treating Scotland, the North of England and Wales as fiefdoms whose sole purpose is to provide lobby fodder so Labour too can appeal to those better off voters in the leafier parts of the south. It’s what kept Tony Blair in power for over a decade. So maybe it’s just not outside the bounds of possibility that the setting sail of the Scottish independence ship is the fault of all the miserable short sighted triangulating lot of them together. Who’s Better Together now eh.

In Islington Labour commentariat world, Scottish independence is a bad thing because it no longer means a block of 40 odd lobby fodder MPs blindly doing whatever it is that the Labour whips tell them to do. Unlike Islington apologists for the Labour party, yer actual traditional Labour supporters in places like Shettleston and Sheffield have long since worked out that blindly supporting the Labour party by providing placepersons with the personality of placemats to blindly do what the whips say does not do a great deal to improve their lives and circumstances. Labour has given us generations of neglect, generations of apathy, generations of hopelessness. The only thing Labour has positively generated in the East End of Glasgow is the impressive expenses claims of Magrit Curran, following in the impressive tradition of the unlamented David Marshall. He’s kept very quiet over the past few years hasn’t he.

The sense of despair and anger is the same in Shettleston and Sheffield, the difference is that voters in Shettleston have something they can do about it. In the case of Shettleston, that something comes in the shape of Natalie McGarry and the SNP. And that’s why those of us who, unlike Magrit, actually live in the East End are telling everyone we can to get angry, get even, and vote Natalie.

Similar advice applies in other parts of Scotland. If you don’t live in the East End of Glasgow you can vote for the lovely Anne McLaughlin in Glasgow North East, or Emma Harper, the nurse in the Borders who wants to make the Tories extinct.

Scotland getting even is the real motor of this election campaign. We’re out for revenge, and it’s a dish best served in the gloomy faces of Labour commentators on the telly on election night as they desperately try to tell us why losing almost all their seats isn’t that bad really. I want to see Magrit Curran as a runner up. I want to see Jim Murphy as the unelectable leader of a fictional party that doesn’t exist.

Labour can promise whatever it likes, £1 billion last week, £800 million this week, beads and blankets, free pixies and stardust sandwiches for every pensioner, but no one believes them any more. They’ve lied so much in the past that they have no credibility left. They deserted Scotland but demand our votes simply because they’re not the Tories. That worked as long as it was a binary choice, as long as there was a switch with only two settings. The switch got broken in the referendum campaign, and it was Labour that broke it. Now we’re going to get even. This is the long slow run up, the pulling of the foot, the taking aim. Labour’s going to get kicked in the nads. The only question left is how high up their lying throats their nads are going to get kicked.

What we learned during the referendum campaign is that Scotland will not be passive, we will not be silent. We will be the agents of our own change. We are the wind in our own sails and this ship is sailing and we’re setting the course. Labour is left floundering in deep and stormy water of its own creation.

Polly can wave from the quayside as she watches her party drown.

Donate to the Dug

This blog relies on your support and donations to keep going – I need to make a living, and have bills to pay. Clicking the donate button will allow you to make a payment directly to my Paypal account. You do not need a Paypal account yourself to make a donation. You can donate as little, or as much, as you want. Many thanks.

Donate Button

27 comments on “Waving from the quayside

  1. Morag says:

    David Marshall. There’s a name to conjure with. When we were campaigning for John Mason in the Glasgow East by-election we were told on no account to mention his name or his vast expenses claims or any possible hypothetical reasons why he might have decided to resign very suddenly when Labour could ill-afford a by-election, but just as the inquiry into expenses claims was about to report.

    Maybe it wasn’t cricket or something.

  2. Robert Graham says:

    Eh guess yer no voting labor then ha ha and where are you hiding the vodo doll of mags ? In the oven ? Someone sticking up for Mr ed on bella just now was tempted to swear but resisted because it would be along with others they will be fishing for to make a headline don’t need to help them do we ?

  3. […] Waving from the quayside […]

  4. bringiton says:

    Pretty Polly is only miming what she hears from the English establishment.
    So sad that people can’t think outside the box they are placed in.

  5. Aye, that tide wasnae long in coming back in again, was it?😊

  6. David Agnew says:

    I did read Browns promise of 800 billion to fix all evils, including to “fight the bed room tax”. At that point my Scottish labour talks Sh*te alarm went off. If you form a government, why on earth would you need to put money aside to fight a tax you promised you would repeal? Answer: You don’t but you do need it if you intend not to repeal it, but mitigate it by creating a new tier of welfare payments. Just like that, labour creates a whole new brand of poverty, another generation of people whose desperation and anger will feed this sclerotic parties sense of entitlement.

    Nicola is going to need the patience of a saint, an iron stomach and a set of long spoons to deal with this party of ass-hats.

  7. No a fearty says:

    Brilliant again Paul ! You cheered up my morning with your article in The National on Magrit and Gordie, you made me laugh and fired me up again to-night with this,a good high kicking up the nads to them all ,Polly included. you sue are on a roll, long may it to continue.

  8. jrmacclure says:

    So as a non-Gàidhlig speaker, what DOES that word mean? I assume that’s not a literal translation.

  9. macart763m says:

    Ms Toynbee playing to party script. Popped this over on Derek Bateman earlier.

    Today: “Scotland’s separation is speeded by the reckless opportunism of his response to the SNP surge. That early morning after the no result, a unionist would have embraced the Scots with warmth and solidarity. Instead, he drove a chisel into the rift with his rebarbative threat to punish Scottish MPs: English votes for English laws is a prescription for fragmentation.”

    Last April: http://wingsoverscotland.com/no-jocks-please-were-british/

    So yeah, last year Polly didn’t think that any Scot could ever again be trusted with a position of responsibility within the UK govt. This year? Well this year we should have been treated with luuuurrrrve by those nasty Tories.

    Much like her party of choice Ms Toynbee seems to live in a permanent state of confusion and contradiction. Or of course it could be a simple case of hypocrisy.

    You choose.

  10. Yes, i posted the word hypocrite on the grauniad re ms toynbee re the no scot could hold high office. Shysters the lot of them.

    Re toerag. As applies to tories. I always thought it had something to do with Tuareg in a pejorative sense as in nomadic wanderers with a carpetbag. No slight intended on tuaregs – a noble people indeed – but nicky fairbairn wtf.?

    Yes totally agree – a binary system but the referendum put paid to that and yes she can watch her non existent brand party lose scotland.

    I am now going to ‘turn off and tune out’ other than to matters scottish – i have no interest in listening to 5 weeks of MSM reporting two magnolia paint salesmen saying they have the better product like something out of Dr. Seuss.

    • I think I did that sometime between September 16th and September 19th (turn off). It was a gradual dulling of the senses, and it coincided with a refusal to go near the BBC for anything other than occasional weather and sports info (and that’s unreliable too!).

  11. Steve Asaneilean says:

    From the Oxford Dictionary: Tory – “Mid 17th century: probably from Irish toraidhe ‘outlaw, highwayman’, from tóir ‘pursue’. The word was used of Irish peasants dispossessed by English settlers and living as robbers, and extended to other marauders especially in the Scottish Highlands. It was then adopted circa1679 as an abusive nickname for supporters of James II” (which is a bit ironic when you think of the kind of people who support the Tories today)

  12. SCED300 says:

    Imagine how it could have been in the Referendum if Robin Cook had still been with us, instead of Reluctant No Voters like Henry McLeish.
    We might just have had a spark of Labour which still had a soul and would still reason.

  13. mary docherty says:

    “two magnolia paint salesmen ” ..hee hee !!!!

  14. hektorsmum says:

    Don’t ya just love these metropolitan types, they pop up for a flying visit meet some MP or other from the party they are having a love in with, and they know all about Scotland.
    Love the blog Paul keep up the good work, adored your bit in the National pleased as punch they are using your not inconsiderable talents, and learned all about the word toerag too which is great.

  15. Andrew Brown (aka hektorsdad) says:

    I agree with my wife (but then you’d expect me to say that).

  16. “Polly wants Scotland to vote for a party that abandoned it a generation ago to keep out a party that abandoned it two generations ago.”

    So true!

  17. You,ve broke the hammer an runoota nails but forge ahead Paul.

  18. Pam McMahon says:

    Not waving but drowning.

  19. fillofficer says:

    gonna get fed up reading all this enlightening claptrap…but no time soon, keep it up

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s